A favourite story at management meetings is that
of the three stone cutters who were asked what they were doing. The first replied: “I am making a
living”. The second kept on hammering
while he said: “I’m doing the best job of stone cutting in the entire
country”. The third one looked up with a
visionary gleam in his eyes and said: “I am building a cathedral”.
The third man is, of course, the true
manager. The first man knows what he
wants to get out of the work and manages to do so. He is likely to give a “fair day’s work for a
fair day’s pay.” But he is not a manager
and will never be one.
It is the second man who is a problem.
Workmanship is essential, without it no work can flourish, in fact, an
organization demoralizes as if it does not demand of its members the most scrupulous
workmanship they are capable of. But there is always a danger that the true
workers, the true professionals, will believe that they are accomplishing
something when in effect they are just polishing stones or collecting
footnotes. Workmanship must be encouraged in the business enterprise. But it must always be related to the needs of
the whole.
The majority of managers in any business
enterprise are, like the second man, concerned with specialized work. But this
striving for professional workmanship in functional and specialized work is
also a danger. It tends to direct
managers vision and efforts away from the goals of the business. The functional
work becomes an end in itself. In far
too many instances the functional manager no longer measures his or her
performance by its contribution to the enterprise, but only by his or her own
professional criteria of workmanship. The functional manager tends to appraise
subordinate by their craftsmanship, to reward and to promote them accordingly.
Such managers resent demands made on them for the sake of business performance
as interference with “good engineering”, “smooth production”, or “hard-hitting
selling”.
The functional managers legitimate desire
for workmanship becomes, unless counterbalanced, the centrifugal force which
tears the enterprise apart and converts it into a loose confederation of
functional empires, each concerned only with its own craft, each jealously
guarding its own “secrets”, each bent on enlarging its own domain rather than
on building the business as a whole. (Drucker, 1996)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.